WebOct 1, 2024 · Posts tagged "CIT vs Shaw Wallace and Co." Home Income Tax Taxation of Alimony October 1, 2024 0 Comments Taxation of Alimony The judiciary has held that a lump-sum receipt in the form of Alimony will not be taxable in the hands of the recipient whereas monthly alimony payments will be treated as income in the hands of the ... WebFeb 28, 2001 · Shaw Wallace & Co. Ltd. v. Dy. Cit Pramod Kumar, A.M. These cross-appeals are directed against the order, dated 10-12-1995, passed by the learned Commissioner (Appeals)-II, Calcutta, in the matter of assessment order under section 143(3) for the assessment year 1978-89. 2.
Solved In CIT, Bengal v Shaw Wallace & Co (1932) the - Chegg
WebRESPONDENT: STRAW BOARD MANUFACTURING CO. LTD. DATE OF JUDGMENT28/04/1989 BENCH: PATHAK, R.S. (CJ) BENCH: PATHAK, R.S. (CJ) KANIA, M.H. CITATION: 1989 AIR 1490 1989 SCR (2) 772 1989 SCC Supl. (2) 523 JT 1989 (2) 264 1989 SCALE (1)1151 CITATOR INFO : RF 1992 SC1622 (4) ACT: Income Tax Act, … WebIn Maharajkumar Gopal Saran Narain Singh v. CIT I.T. Act, even though the annuity did not constitute or provide a profit or gain to the assessee. After referring to the aforesaid decision of the Privy Council in the case of Shaw Wallace & Co., their Lordship observed as follows (p. 242) : "The word 'income' is not limited by the words 'profits ... fitbit charge 4 fitness and activity tracker
WALLACE v. CITY OF CHICAGO FindLaw
WebCommissioner Of Income-Tax, Bengal v. Shaw Wallace And Company Sir George Lowndes.- This is an appeal from a judgment of the High Court at Calcutta delivered on a reference made to it under S. 66, Indian Income-tax Act, 11 of 1922. WebShaw Wallace & Co. Ltd., the assessee, was at the material time the holding company in respect of the following subsidiary companies holding 100% of the shares of the later : (a) Atlas Fertilisers Ltd.; (b) Bengal Distilleries Co. Ltd., and (c) Indo-Agri. Ltd. can flagyl cause upset stomach